DEVELOPER
WITHDRAWS PLANS FOR HI-RISE RESIDENCE IN MEAT MARKET; VICTORY IN FIGHT TO
PRESERVE HISTORIC MEATPACKING DISTRICT TEMPERED BY DEVELOPER'S CLAIM HE WILL
PURSUE "AS OF RIGHT" DEVELOPMENT ON SITE Hearing on Landmarking of
Meatpacking District Remains Set for March 18 at 9:30 am Landmarks Preservation
Commission, 1 Centre Street
Greenwich
Village -- Lawyers for the developer of the proposed 450 foot tall luxury high
rise in the Meat Packing district withdrew their application today for a
variance needed to allow this project to go forward (see attached letter to the
Board of Standards and Appeals [BSA]). Today was the last day for public
comment on this proposal, and the BSA had received a flood of letters and
postcards opposing the plan. At the final public hearing on the proposal on
December 11, over 150 people, led by the Greenwich Village Society for Historic
Preservation and its Save Gansevoort Market Task Force, turned out to demand
the proposal be rejected. A decision was scheduled to come from the BSA on
March 25, but believing he would lose the case, the applicant chose instead to
withdraw the request.
"This threat
to Gansevoort Market's very existence has been eliminated," declared Andrew
Berman, Executive Director of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic
Preservation and its 'Save Gansevoort Market' Task Force. "A residential
building had no place in the middle of the Meatpacking district, where
residents could never live with the noisy and odorous meat businesses or the
late night bars and clubs, and would have inevitably forced out these long-time
businesses. Also, any sort of 450 foot tall building had no place in this
historic, low-rise district, and would have permanently destroyed the scale and
feel of this unique neighborhood," added Berman.
In addition
to fighting this residential variance, the Greenwich Village Society for
Historic Preservation (GVSHP) has also been pushing for historic district
status for the area, and after a two and a half year battle finally got the
Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) to schedule a hearing for March 18 on a
landmarking plan. However, while GVSHP has requested that the entire district
be considered, the district the LPC has proposed and which will be heard on the
18th does not include most of the waterfront blocks in the district, including
the 848 Washington Street site of the proposed development. In the
attached letter to the BSA withdrawing the
application for a residential variance, the lawyers state that the "applicant
intends to proceed with development as-of-right," meaning they would build
within the currently allowed zoning, which allows hotel development. The
developer Stephen Touhey has previously stated he would try to develop a hotel
at the site if he could not develop his luxury residential high rise. GVSHP has
asked the City to consider changing the zoning in this area not to allow new
hotel construction.
"We have won
this battle, but we recognize that the war is not over," stated GVSHP Executive
Director Andrew Berman. "We are very concerned about any new development Mr.
Touhey would propose for this area until or unless historic district
protections are in place, to ensure the development is compatible with the
surrounding district. And while a hotel would not have the same devastating
impact as a residence, it might still create significant problems for the
existing businesses, and we are concerned about the developer's inclination to
try to build a very tall building with no relationship to its historic
surroundings. Given the economy, however, we are also very skeptical that Mr.
Touhey will be able to get financing for construction of a hotel at this
location any time soon. Regardless, we will continue to monitor the situation
closely, and oppose any inappropriate development at the site," stated Berman.
The hearing
on the proposed historic district designation for the Gansevoort Market
(Meatpacking district) is scheduled for 9:30 am on Tuesday March 18, at the
Landmarks Preservation Commission, One Centre Street, 9th floor.
Attachment: Withdrawal Letter to BSA |